1
Support and Feedback / Re: Build 3088 (bugs)
« on: April 21, 2025, 16:03:07 »
I have very similar problems. I updated a few minutes ago.
I can navigate using the folder list and access files like that, but cannot use the 'go up' button to navigate through the folder structure. However, if I change the drive using the drive tab, then I can navigate the folders normally in that folder, but not the original. If I close MC whilst on that different drive, restart and go back to original drive, it sometimes lets me navigate that drive normally, but it seems very erratic.
Hope you can fix it soon. It's pretty unusable ATM.
I also found another possible problem. I went to downgrade the app so it was usable. The latest version was described as
MultiCommander_x64_Portable_(15.2.0.3077)
I download this and copy the files in to the correct folde. When I start MC it tells me there are other versions. I choose v 3086 as the latest available, but instead it updates to v3088,
Even if I mke a mistake, (I don't understand why I see dirferent versions available) an invitation to upgrade to 3086 should install 3086, not 3088.
I can navigate using the folder list and access files like that, but cannot use the 'go up' button to navigate through the folder structure. However, if I change the drive using the drive tab, then I can navigate the folders normally in that folder, but not the original. If I close MC whilst on that different drive, restart and go back to original drive, it sometimes lets me navigate that drive normally, but it seems very erratic.
Hope you can fix it soon. It's pretty unusable ATM.
I also found another possible problem. I went to downgrade the app so it was usable. The latest version was described as
MultiCommander_x64_Portable_(15.2.0.3077)
I download this and copy the files in to the correct folde. When I start MC it tells me there are other versions. I choose v 3086 as the latest available, but instead it updates to v3088,
Even if I mke a mistake, (I don't understand why I see dirferent versions available) an invitation to upgrade to 3086 should install 3086, not 3088.