Author Topic: Update from v10 to v11.2  (Read 12716 times)

AlanJB

  • VIP Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 436
  • VERY old Programmer
    • View Profile
Update from v10 to v11.2
« on: July 04, 2021, 19:28:15 »
@Mathias,

Can you confirm that MultiScript UDCs will not work after the update until each one is converted to the new format (I thought the conversion was automatic)?

Although the UserDefinedCommands.zip was created in the Scripts folder and each .udc file referenced a #file: in my original script files (eg. Copy File In Focus.mcs), none of them worked...

Can you clarify the conversion process, please?

Mathias (Author)

  • Administrator
  • VIP Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4423
    • View Profile
    • Multi Commander
Re: Update from v10 to v11.2
« Reply #1 on: July 05, 2021, 16:53:24 »
Hmm No.. What is not working

Hmm #file: so external scripts ?
All those script changes was in v11 nothing about that is changes between 11.0 and 11.2. I cant remember right now but all script are just converted into individual files.
#file references should still work

AlanJB

  • VIP Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 436
  • VERY old Programmer
    • View Profile
Re: Update from v10 to v11.2
« Reply #2 on: July 05, 2021, 17:20:31 »
Mathias,

Apologies if I was not clear enough...

I updated from v10.2 to v11.2 and UserDefinedCommands.zip was created in the Scripts folder.
Each .udc file in the .zip referenced one of my original script files (as I expected).
But none of my MultiScripts would work until I manually converted them.

I thought that conversion was automatic.

Is that clearer?

TIA


Mathias (Author)

  • Administrator
  • VIP Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4423
    • View Profile
    • Multi Commander
Re: Update from v10 to v11.2
« Reply #3 on: July 16, 2021, 19:08:11 »
Strange. External script file should still work.
It works in the test files I have..


AlanJB

  • VIP Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 436
  • VERY old Programmer
    • View Profile
Re: Update from v10 to v11.2
« Reply #4 on: July 16, 2021, 19:39:36 »
Not a problem really, @Mathias.

It was trivial to complete the conversion.

Thanks :)