Recent Posts

1

Beta Releases / Re: 15.7 BETA

« Last post by total_annihilation00 on Today at 00:17:54 »

Don't COMBO have a special quarantine area where it places files ? It just deletes them ?
It might be that COMBO have renamed them. It does not have an UI where you see files it quarantine ? and from there you can bring them back ? Most AV software has that.
( From AI :
The COMODO quarantine area is a secure, isolated section within Comodo antivirus software where potentially malicious or suspicious files are stored.
These files are encrypted and prevented from running to ensure they cannot infect your system or cause any harm)
So you might need to restore them from within COMBO.. you will not find them your self


Maybe change AV software.  Often built in Defender is good enough unless you don't have special requirements.

Problem with all FileManager is that AV software finds them suspicious.. Here is an app that have code much code in it to handle files, copy, rename, and delete them.. That is very suspicious.  So all FileManager often lots gets false positives results on them. And there is nothing to do about it.

No worries, it's all good ! & no, COMODO does a weird 'Reverse & Block' operation when it detects CryptoLocker threats (ofc this was benign) & so all the transfers are cancelled & undone. It's alright though, I guess it guards the Downloads folder a little too aggressively. Those games were just Zips of the Installers, the actual games are already installed (I re-downloaded a bunch of them in GOG edition so they're guaranteed to work.)

2

Beta Releases / Re: 15.7 BETA

« Last post by Mathias (Author) on Yesterday at 15:39:55 »

Don't COMBO have a special quarantine area where it places files ? It just deletes them ?
It might be that COMBO have renamed them. It does not have an UI where you see files it quarantine ? and from there you can bring them back ? Most AV software has that.
( From AI :
The COMODO quarantine area is a secure, isolated section within Comodo antivirus software where potentially malicious or suspicious files are stored.
These files are encrypted and prevented from running to ensure they cannot infect your system or cause any harm)
So you might need to restore them from within COMBO.. you will not find them your self


Maybe change AV software.  Often built in Defender is good enough unless you don't have special requirements.

Problem with all FileManager is that AV software finds them suspicious.. Here is an app that have code much code in it to handle files, copy, rename, and delete them.. That is very suspicious.  So all FileManager often lots gets false positives results on them. And there is nothing to do about it.

3

Beta Releases / Re: 15.7 BETA

« Last post by total_annihilation00 on Yesterday at 13:03:32 »

Suffered from 2 data losses in MC: #1 My Aliases were lost #2 Yesterday I was attempting to move 5-7 Zip Files (400 MB total of MS-DOS games) & COMODO flagged MC as 'Possible Cryptolocker' & all my files got lost in the transfer when COMODO quarantined MC. I searched everywhere for the Zips but they were lost forever. This specific Cryptolocker transfer abortions happened to me before twice: when moving some images to & fro Downloads folder, & also when mass-renaming files in Downloads, triggering COMODO Cryptolocker Recognizers ! It's a shame —they were retro-games ! (though I recovered a bunch of them (GOG editions so they're guaranteed to work !)) I remember setting MultiCommander as Trusted in COMODO AV so I never saw this coming ! (maybe 'cause of an Invalid Certificate issue ? Just a hunch…) :'(
P.S: I fixed it (hopefully) by disabling the CryptoLocker Recognizer module in COMODO AV/FW.

4

Beta Releases / Re: 15.7 BETA

« Last post by total_annihilation00 on Yesterday at 03:17:26 »

Before, you could press Ctrl+F, search for something, & then when you pressed Enter the focus would switch back to the Explorer topmost Folder/File —now it doesn't switch focus back to the Explorer directory items (List View.) I miss that ! I have to use the mouse to single-click back to the Explorer view to use arrow keys to peruse items [after using the Find Filter Box] —it's a little inconvenient ! Could you bring that functionality back please ?

It is not changed.  It should work..

* Ctrl+F  focus set to Filter View box..
* Type something.. . the list view is filtered
* Confirm with Return key
* Focus is back to filelist

Works for me. Use that daily. 
Strange.What happens to focus.. DO you see what focus ends up.. still in Filter box ? some other place ?  does tab works to change tab side focus..?

Yeah it's working now, but I will test further to find out the root 'cause of it (& how to reproduce it)

5

Beta Releases / Re: 15.7 BETA

« Last post by Mathias (Author) on December 11, 2025, 16:32:31 »

Before, you could press Ctrl+F, search for something, & then when you pressed Enter the focus would switch back to the Explorer topmost Folder/File —now it doesn't switch focus back to the Explorer directory items (List View.) I miss that ! I have to use the mouse to single-click back to the Explorer view to use arrow keys to peruse items [after using the Find Filter Box] —it's a little inconvenient ! Could you bring that functionality back please ?

It is not changed.  It should work..

* Ctrl+F  focus set to Filter View box..
* Type something.. . the list view is filtered
* Confirm with Return key
* Focus is back to filelist

Works for me. Use that daily. 
Strange.What happens to focus.. DO you see what focus ends up.. still in Filter box ? some other place ?  does tab works to change tab side focus..?

6

Beta Releases / Re: 15.7 BETA

« Last post by total_annihilation00 on December 11, 2025, 12:05:36 »

Before, you could press Ctrl+F, search for something, & then when you pressed Enter the focus would switch back to the Explorer topmost Folder/File —now it doesn't switch focus back to the Explorer directory items (List View.) I miss that ! I have to use the mouse to single-click back to the Explorer view to use arrow keys to peruse items [after using the Find Filter Box] —it's a little inconvenient ! Could you bring that functionality back please ?

7

Support and Feedback / Re: SFTP problem

« Last post by Yearling on December 10, 2025, 19:38:53 »

OK, I have last beta version 64bit v.15.7 build 3123. Certificat (both) was generated by PUTTYgen, but results are the same as yesterday
I have tested both "Do not verify key file" checked and unchecked.
I have tested two certificates (first without password, second with password) - both in WinSCP SFTP client work flawlessly but in Multi Commander not :-(
There are log files in attachment - two from Multi Commnader (for both certificates) and one from WinSCP client for comparision.

2025-12-10 18:59:23 Windows Linebreak are used for text file transfers
2025-12-10 18:59:23 Connecting to sftp.______.cz:1222
2025-12-10 18:59:23 Connected
2025-12-10 18:59:24 Key exchange method : diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256
2025-12-10 18:59:24 Host key method : rsa-sha2-512
2025-12-10 18:59:24 Encryption method (both directions) : aes256-ctr
2025-12-10 18:59:24 MAC (message authentication code) method (both directions) : hmac-sha2-256
2025-12-10 18:59:24 Compression method (both directions) : none
2025-12-10 18:59:24 Fingerprint : 3E 0D 34 8A 0F 28 BD 24 8A FA F1 4E E3 03 18 F4
2025-12-10 18:59:24 Failed - Session not connected
2025-12-10 18:59:24 Disconnecting...
2025-12-10 18:59:24 Closing Session...
2025-12-10 18:59:25 Session closed

8

Support and Feedback / Re: SFTP problem

« Last post by Mathias (Author) on December 10, 2025, 09:47:17 »

That is latest Release,, In Core settings you enable you update to beta versions..

9

Support and Feedback / Re: SFTP problem

« Last post by Yearling on December 10, 2025, 09:43:31 »

I am using version Multi Commander v15.6 (Build 3119) (64 bit). Is there any newer beta version (where)?

10

Support and Feedback / Re: SFTP problem

« Last post by Mathias (Author) on December 10, 2025, 09:02:03 »

if you do not check the "Do not verify keyfiles" it will verify them..

If you upgrade to latest beta it will log move what is happening.

Might be that the keyfile format is not support. I know that the format it supports is the one that PuttyGen generates